Had WSU won that game – they would be in the mix for the final four. That one over turned call may have cost the conference big time. It was a horrible call at the time and now it really stings. HUGE mistake!!!
The targeting call that was overturned was when a Wazzu player hit JT Daniels while he was taking a knee. The over turned call favored Wazzu.
Let me clarify some more. He is referenig to Jayden Daniels of the Hallandale trio. /s
Great news, but wrong thread :).
I was referring to the no-call on Gustin. I thought (mistakenly I guess) that the third party got involved in that no-call too. It was certainly targeting and should have been called even though it was missed on the field.
The targeting call that was overturned would have gone against WSU. The call that was missed was against porter gustin and USC. The overturning of the first call may have led the refs to not call the gustin hit, but that’s just speculation
If I recall correctly, the ‘third-party’ overturned call went against USC and benefited WSU. The no-call on Porter Gustin hit that Leach made a fuss about, that’s a seperate issue.
‘third party’ you mean the man who needs to be fired? what a wanker is that guy
If I remember right, the overturned call benefitted WSU as a WSU player targetted JT Daniels and the call you’re complaining of was actually a missed call on Gustin.
I just wanted to make that clear.
If my memory serves me correctly, the targeting call that was overturned ended up benefitting WSU. There was a no-call later on in the game where they should have ejected Gustin, and didn’t.
Correct. It’s probably that they should regret not being consistent in the officiating of the rule. That is really the problem.
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/sep/26/larry-scott-controversial-hit-from-usc-washington-/
They looked at it over the weekend and Larry Scott said it was very close.
I am still not clear on this topic.
I’ve been wondering about this too. You’d have to believe that they are. WSU not only has a loss, but now it’s turned into a loss to a very average team.
I think you are mistaking that for the missed targeting call that should have been called on USC when Wazzu was driving down the field in their last drive. It would have given them a first down and put them well into field goal range. It was an egregious non call as it was text book targeting. Way moreso than the BS that has been called across the conference since.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Welcome to Ute Hub › Forums › Utah Utes Sports › Football › So, are the powers in the Pac 12 regretting over turning the targeting call?
Rate your excitement level for Utah Men's Basketball playing in the NIT
Total Voters: 121
© Copyright 2015-2024
Website and Mobile App by Tony Korologos