So was the decision to go for 2 at the end of the game based on analytics?


Viewing 3 reply threads
    • #175418

      Charlie Foxtrot
      Ute Fan
      @charliefoxtrot

      Or was it based on Whitt saying Cam, we win or loose with you.  Go bring this one home.

    • #175426
      1

      EagleMountainUte
      Ute Fan
      @battlegroundute

      Utah wasn’t able to stop SC inside the 35. I think that was why. Or Whitt just decided to flex on them. ChadKyle>>>>>Riverboat Kyle

      • #175448

        Utesbyfive
        Ute Fan
        @utesbyfive

        He decided to let Cam flex on them.

        • #175454

          EagleMountainUte
          Ute Fan
          @battlegroundute

          They had no answer for Kincaid or Rising. 
          Gotta pay more for that DC next season $C. 

    • #175438

      PNW Ute
      Ute Fan
      @pnwute

      Probably the latter. The way Cam was playing, giving him the ball makes sense.

      Analytically, it’s probably about a wash. Two point plays succeed about 43% of the time in college. OT would probably be about 50% win chance for either team. But add in the consideration that there’s about a 6% chance that a kicker misses an extra point, and the chances of winning seems about the same either way. 

    • #175453
      1

      RoboUte
      Ute Fan
      @hamplate

      They were moving freely on us and we were moving somewhat reliably on them. Given the context I think he just called it from feel.

Viewing 3 reply threads
BACK TO TOP

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Welcome to Ute Hub Forums Utah Utes Sports Football So was the decision to go for 2 at the end of the game based on analytics?

  • This topic is empty.