Yeesh. What a crew…
Oregon State is bad. They’re just bad.
But, Ohio State’s QB…whew…he good.
That OSU running back has some speeeeed.
I wish our Offense hummed like that. Well oiled, well tuned machine.
Totes jelly, as the 13 year olds might say.
Absolutely. I totally agree. Just so…clean.
I guess there’s a second hand douchebag on this board who doesn’t want a well oiled machine for an offense.
Ha ha. Yeah, there is some real…different folks.
I didn’t thumbs down you, but I think it has less to do with you wanting a well-oiled machine of an offense and more to do with you implying we don’t have a well-oiled machine of an offense.
There are some on this board who down-vote just about anything that isn’t red-goggled praise for our program.
Very true.
Anyone who thinks that we have that now is wearing a much darker shade of red goggles than I do.
Anyone who can’t express an opinion and uses a thumbs down instead is probably too stupid to understand football.
That’s all I’m sayin’…
Utah has an offensive identity now at least. Baby steps….I am always green with envy on teams with great offenses. Stanford being the one I most enjoy.
I’m not agreeing with the thumbs down but stupidity isn’t always the reason for a thumbs down. Maybe they see the comment as too stupid to waste time with any response more than a thumbs down. Especially in response to a person that calls people douche bags and stupid instead of using a more intelectual response in their debate.
That’s funny coming from the stupid f**k who called everybody a fag when he came on the boards
Stupid f**k, that’s clever.
Not as clever as alienating an entire community with your homophobic rants.
You fat ass twat, your cousin doesn’t run this board.
That was like ten years ago and it wasn’t meant to be homophobic, it was a joke and misunderstood which I explained quite well at the time and in the end nobody felt alienated. It was dumb on my part but that’s who I was back then and this is who you are now. My post history has nothing to do with what my cousin did or didn’t run. You’re making things up and exagerating to defend your embarrasing behavior. I should just thumbs down, I really don’t need to post all this but I will post because I’m enjoying you proving my point over and over again.
I’m not embarrassed. I’m totally fine in my own skin. I thought you were a c**t then, I think you’re a c**t now.
I’m just devastated right now.
Yeah. I think we understand each other. If you ever feel like talking it out, let me know.
No, you’re just too much of a bad ass I’m afraid to talk to you anymore.
Yeah. Smart.
That’s why Thursday was deceiving. The offense wasn’t polished but it was the most balanced game we’ve played offensively from a statistical stand point probably since we’ve been in the Pac-12.
Outside of the turnovers the offense hit just about every statistical expectation most of us were hoping to see. Huntley was near 275, his completion percentage was pretty good, he spread the ball around to 12 different receivers, Moss got 150, we had nearly 600 total yards of offense, we moved the chains, won time of possession, only two offensive penalties, no holding or illegal man down field calls, I mean really there’s a lot more positive you can say about the offense than negative.
Sure, it wasn’t smooth, and it was an FCS opponent, but I’ll take the stats over the polish any day of the week. If the offense finds rhythm and ups the efficiency then watch out. It’s gonna be like watching 2004 all over again.
I like this offense but it is far from a well oiled machine. You turn it over four times because of the competition level and Utah’s defense was amazing.
Agreed. The short throw game needs to improve this week. Huntley could take a bit off his passes and the receivers need to bring it in when they get their hands on the ball. It got better as he game went on but those killed some drives for us early.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Welcome to Ute Hub › Forums › Misc › That Ohio State Student Body
Rate your excitement level for Utah Men's Basketball playing in the NIT
Total Voters: 124
© Copyright 2015-2024
Website and Mobile App by Tony Korologos