Interesting. THat statement seems to tell a different story than the U of Pay official statement. I guess the courts will get to decide which one is correct.
That reads like a guy who is trying to save face for his future. I am biased because I think the guy is a douche. Cheating on his wife reaffirms my viewpoint.
I agree with some of that, but it doesn’t make him guilty of anything other than being a douche. Cheating is wrong in itself, but shouldn’t alone cost the guy his job or career.
It cost him his position (as coach), but not his livelihood (his payout). They are paying out the remainder of his contract just to get rid of him, in front of Title IX and other investigations.
Douches usually do douchey things. Sexually harrassing someone isn’t outside the realm of a cheater. Honestly I am surprised it hasn’t gone the rounds in college football yet.
.
Loading ...
