The second top-16 rankings from the NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball Committee wiil be released Thursday.
This “bracketology” is pure partisan BS. In women’s basketball, the PAC-12 is the best conference in the country, top to bottom. However, this “expert” has nine ACC teams going to the tournament, and the PAC-12 is projected to have only seven. In a PAC-12/ACC matchup of top to bottom teams, the PAC-12 would be 12-0. Even the 0-16 ASU team would beat their ACC opponent.
The NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball Committee released the 1st top-16 rankings on Feb 9 – 2 Pac-12, 4 ACC teams.
Massey’s algorithm conference ranks – #1 Pac-12, #2 ACC.
We’ll find out if the PAC or ACC is better in a few weeks when the games that really count are played.
All the games really count.
The partisan bias is that the projections are made by ESPN, and the person making them works for ESPN. ESPN/ABC televises all of the ACC Women’s basketball games, and very few PAC-12 games. These predictions are not objective, and are intended to favor ESPN. It is also the reason that some Division I games not being televised by ESPN/ABC are not even listed on the ESPN mobile app—even when the user has listed one of the teams in such a game as one of their favorites on the ESPN app!
I like your theory
My friend told me that your anti-ESPN post sounds like me talking about the government or the corporate state. We all pick our battles.
For me, ESPN is everything I need to follow standard college sports all in one place. I am aware of the bias you mention. It just doesn’t pervade my thoughts while visiting the site.
Bracketology gives one a fun thing to ponder twice a week and I look forward to it.
ESPN is an example of what happens when a media dominates college sports. It is a business, and tries to shape viewpoints to their own, even when their viewpoint defies reality. They provide more exposure, but at a cost—favoring certain schools and ignoring many others, or imposing an additional cost to see others (aka ESPN+ rather than ESPN3).
They give almost no coverage to D-III.
I use the d3sports.com sites to get that information.
I’m a hardcore Ute fan and follow all college WBB closely. I actually don’t think Creme is biased in his picks, he’s just trying to get the selection committee’s picks predicted right. For most of the year he’s had 8 teams each from the ACC, Big Ten and Pac-12. He dropped Oregon from his predictions since they are now 14-13 and have lost 7 straight. I have a hard time arguing that they’re getting screwed based on bias. Same thing for Nebraska who got dropped from the Big Ten after some ugly losses.
These are my thoughts as well. Thank you.
Every PAC-12 Women’s team has an overwhelming winning non-conference record. The PAC-12 team with the worst non-conference record is ASU at 7-2. No other Division I Women’s conference has such a record outside their conference. It is pure BS and bias for the PAC-12 to not have the most NCAAA bids. Selecting teams on recent performance, instead of overall performance, is bias often used to justify the selection of a team preferred by the selector(s).
By the way, Oregon’s non-conference record is 9-2.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Welcome to Ute Hub › Forums › Utah Utes Sports › Basketball (Women) › Utah WBALL continues as a 2-seed in Creme’s latest
Rate your excitement level for Utah Men's Basketball playing in the NIT
Total Voters: 126
© Copyright 2015-2024
Website and Mobile App by Tony Korologos