WSJ ranks teams for performance on and off the field. Living right, bros!

Viewing 5 reply threads

- 09/02/2019 at 5:55 PM #102317
  3
  
  Duhwayne
  Ute Fan
  
  @duhwayne
  
  https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-footballs-2019-grid-of-shame-11567091249
- 09/02/2019 at 5:56 PM #102319
  
  whitlessham
  Ute Fan
  
  @whitelssham
  
  pay wall
  - 09/02/2019 at 6:59 PM #102327
    5
    
    Duhwayne
    Ute Fan
    
    @duhwayne
- 09/02/2019 at 7:11 PM #102331
  1
  
  EagleMountainUte
  Ute Fan
  
  @battlegroundute
  
  I see where the poo poo team is. Zona should be right next to them.
- 09/02/2019 at 7:29 PM #102333
  2
  
  UtMtBiker
  Ute Fan
  
  @utmtbiker
  
  Whats the criteria for performance off the field? A graph with logos is pretty pointless if we don’t know what the graph is representing.
  - 09/02/2019 at 8:06 PM #102345
    
    whitlessham
    Ute Fan
    
    @whitelssham
    
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS
  - 09/02/2019 at 8:20 PM #102349
    1
    
    mfaulk80
    Ute Fan
    
    @mfaulk80
    
    Or even the ‘on the field’ criteria? The most obvious curiosity is how are we ranked ahead of Washington?
    - 09/03/2019 at 1:52 PM #102478
      
      Central Coast Ute
      Ute Fan
      
      @flip2848
      
      Probably in relation to recruit rankings.
  - 09/02/2019 at 8:24 PM #102352
    1
    
    ironman1315
    Ute Fan
    
    @ironman1315
    
    If you read the article, I believe they have the methodology in there.
    - 09/02/2019 at 8:27 PM #102353
      
      ironman1315
      Ute Fan
      
      @ironman1315
      
      Although I use the term loosely.
- 09/03/2019 at 10:10 AM #102436
  2
  
  Duhwayne
  Ute Fan
  
  @duhwayne
  
  Off field methodology (for those griping without access to text of the article) are academics/graduation rate, lack of ncaa violations, and no arrests.
- 09/03/2019 at 1:08 PM #102470
  
  leftyjace
  Ute Fan
  
  @leftyjace
  
  Here’s the same pic, but larger: