Hate to complain, however #8 should have been called for a targeting as well.


Viewing 2 reply threads
    • #201635
      2

      UTE98
      Ute Fan
      @ute98

      The play where #8 got up woozy after hitting Barnes should have been reviewed for targeting. Led with the crown of his helmet, got up woozy, shouldn’t that have been an automatic review. Can they review it and suspend #8 for next game? I mean if they can review Bishop’s targeting why couldn’t they do that this week?

    • #201651

      NarfUte
      Ute Fan
      @narfute

      Saw the same thing and I agree. I think we got the next plan off too soon for a booth review to be called

    • #201653
      5

      Yergensen
      Ute Fan
      @yergensen

      Pretty sure Barnes led with the crown of his helmet. Targeting on Barnes, he hammered that kid.

      • #201664

        chinngiskhaan
        Ute Fan
        @chinngiskhaan

        yep, I don’t think #8 would have been anywhere near hitting Barnes in the head had Barnes not done that.

Viewing 2 reply threads
BACK TO TOP

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Welcome to Ute Hub Forums Utah Utes Sports Football Hate to complain, however #8 should have been called for a targeting as well.