AnonymousInactive
Only six Hail Mary’s and it would be a reality.
You’re only two plays away from being 0-4!
Only the “purple” Utes. A tiny, tiny, tiny minority.
Virginia’s QB seemed o be afraid of running across the LOS. Several times I saw him loop back while looking for an open receiver rather than take an easy 5 yd gain, only to run out of bounds or slide sideways for a 3 yd loss.
Boise looked very good in that game last night. It is always frustrating to watch them run their pass plays to perfection, particularly the bubble screens and the mid-range passing game. Their WRa have excellent blocking abilities and they run crisp routes to get open. I do not want to go away from the offense that Utah already has, but it would be very nice to be more effective at passing.
I added some borders to the reply threads. Hit refresh and you’ll see them. I see the reddit one. They have a left border only, which serves to show the reply threads. Interesting.
The thing that having the topics in different categories does allow users to filter their viewing. I’m not really interested in anything other than men’s bball or football. I don’t want to see baseball, hockey, women’s sports or anything else.
The only thing that makes me jealous is Jordan Villamin. You may recall that Utah and Oregon State were his only P5 offers and he visited Utah. Too bad we missed out on him.
I want to get 2 tickets for a couple of friends to the Cal game too. But as a long time season ticket holder and crimson club member I would expect to pay ticket price plus pro rata share of CC donation. Seems only fair.
And if the market exceeds that value, then if my friends want them they should not whine about it and pay the market rate.
Paying CC donation and purchasing the tickets is way I am able to secure my tickets every year. Why would any ticket holder not reasonably expect at least that much?
Frankly, single game tickets should be marked up the same way by the Athletic Department. There should be sub totaled ticket price, cc single seat mandatory donation and total price on the face of all tickets
I’m kinda like @azswayze. I only ever blue star trolls over on ufn and never just for for simply disagreeing with a post so I see his argument for the utility. However any system that can be abused will be abused so the trick is to figure out how to control trolls through some decentralized method while limiting/disincentivizing abuse?
I like the idea of collapsing comments with enough “dislikes”
I like the idea of limiting posts by folks who consistently make “disliked” comments
I like the idea of having “dislikes” not be anonymous
I like the idea of limiting the number of dislikes in a time period maybe x/day or week
Perhaps instead of a dislike button what about a “troll” icon then it’s clear this isn’t just to show you disagree but an trolling control measure?
Yes, and not only is it a winning record- it’s the biggest winning percentage against them,
tied only with the vaunted Chicago University Club.
Utah @ 
UCLA 
