First thought is that UCLA doesn’t belong anywhere near the top 30 duos in the country. What has either coach really done that is so impressive?
You’re freaking UCLA and you’re sitting in 10th place in the Pac-12 in basketball and really only finished #6 in football. Despite all have the talent UCLA brings it they have been pretty mediocre. Maybe thats a harsh word, but they are middle of the Pac at best when you combine the two sports/coaches.
Oregon is probably too high. I’ll take a wait and see approach with Mark Helfrich, but his first year was all Mariota lets not pretend it wasn’t. Altman is a fantastic basketball coach.
I think one could make an argument for Utah as #1 in the Pac-12, but it might be a little rose colored of me.
Pac-12 aside there are some pretty awful schools in the top 10. A lot the schools get into the top 10 on the merit of a single coach which kind of defeats the purpose of these rankings. ea. Alabama & Duke.
Radford @ 
Utah 
