Ute Hub Logo

So was the decision to go for 2 at the end of the game based on analytics?

Viewing 3 reply threads
    • 10/15/2022 at 10:21 PM #175418

      Charlie Foxtrot
      Ute Fan
      @charliefoxtrot

      Or was it based on Whitt saying Cam, we win or loose with you.  Go bring this one home.

    • 10/15/2022 at 10:23 PM #175426
      1

      EagleMountainUte
      Ute Fan
      @battlegroundute

      Utah wasn’t able to stop SC inside the 35. I think that was why. Or Whitt just decided to flex on them. ChadKyle>>>>>Riverboat Kyle

      • 10/15/2022 at 10:43 PM #175448

        Utesbyfive
        Ute Fan
        @utesbyfive

        He decided to let Cam flex on them.

        • 10/15/2022 at 10:49 PM #175454

          EagleMountainUte
          Ute Fan
          @battlegroundute

          They had no answer for Kincaid or Rising. 
          Gotta pay more for that DC next season $C. 

    • 10/15/2022 at 10:31 PM #175438

      PNW Ute
      Ute Fan
      @pnwute

      Probably the latter. The way Cam was playing, giving him the ball makes sense.

      Analytically, it’s probably about a wash. Two point plays succeed about 43% of the time in college. OT would probably be about 50% win chance for either team. But add in the consideration that there’s about a 6% chance that a kicker misses an extra point, and the chances of winning seems about the same either way. 

    • 10/15/2022 at 10:46 PM #175453
      1

      RoboUte
      Ute Fan
      @hamplate

      They were moving freely on us and we were moving somewhat reliably on them. Given the context I think he just called it from feel.

Viewing 3 reply threads
BACK TO TOP

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Welcome to Ute Hub › Forums › Utah Utes Sports › Football › So was the decision to go for 2 at the end of the game based on analytics?