I thought it would be fun to compare game 1 from 2016 and 2017

This topic has 10 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by Puget Ute.

Viewing 3 reply threads

Author

Posts
- 09/01/2017 at 9:10 AM #39045
  4
  
  Larry B
  Participant
  
  2016 vs SUU 2017 vs ND
  
  3rd down 8/17. 6/14
  
  4th down 1/1. 1/1
  
  Total yds 436. 499
  
  Pass. 23/39 (298) 23/32 (227)
  
  Yds per pass 7.6. 7.1
  
  Int 0. 1
  
  Rush 138 (37 att) 272 (47 att)
  
  Yds per rush 3.7. 5.8
  
  Penalties 6-40 Yds 11-135 Yds
  
  Defense 3 sack/9 TFL. 1 sack/6 TFL
  
  Punt 6-333 yds. 1-52 yds
  
  SUU ended 2016 at 6-5. ND ended 2016 at 9-3. I’m not sure any of this means anything but there are some interesting takeaways. We had twice as many rushing yds against ND on 10 more attempts. We had WAY more penalty yds against ND. We only punted once against ND.
- 09/01/2017 at 9:13 AM #39046
  2
  
  ironman1315
  Participant
  
  I think this team will shock people. Starting next week.
- 09/01/2017 at 9:21 AM #39049
  
  KiYi-Ute
  Participant
  
  Ugh. Those penalty yards are painful to look at. Hopefully we get that cleaned up. No more 2nd and 40 please.
  - 09/01/2017 at 9:23 AM #39050
    1
    
    ironman1315
    Participant
    
    I think we will. Most of those can be attributed to aggression and BS calls that are NEVER made at any other time.
    - 09/01/2017 at 9:29 AM #39054
      4
      
      Larry B
      Participant
      
      Plus the two facemask penalties by ND that the refs completely missed. 1 against Huntley after a long run and 1 on Blackmon after his interception.
  - 09/01/2017 at 9:23 AM #39051
    2 1
    
    ladyinred
    Participant
    
    Agreed, the penalties. Ugh. Although some of them were bogus, like the celebration penalty. Also from what I saw, that roughing the kicker penalty was a stre
- 09/01/2017 at 9:24 AM #39053
  1
  
  PlainsUte
  Participant
  
  Interesting, I thought UND looked a lot better than SUU.
  
  The penalties and lack of sacks are concerning. The penalty issue should give the coaches good fodder for practice motivation.
  
  The UND QB was quite good at evading the rush, he really had no fear and took some good hits. Their OL seemed pretty good at pass protection, not so good for the run.
  - 09/01/2017 at 9:30 AM #39055
    3
    
    KiYi-Ute
    Participant
    
    Yeah, I was really hoping that our D-Line would create more pressure and come away with more than one sack. I think a big part of being able to beat BYU will be putting Tatum Mango on his back.
    - 09/01/2017 at 10:27 AM #39064
      1
      
      ironman1315
      Participant
      
      Something I noticed, the DEs didn’t really seem to try to get pressure. I think the game plan was prevent-run D for them. Meaning they stay home at all times and wait for the run to come to them. The pressure was supposed to come up the middle, and it did at times but that kid was a touch too quick. I think the DEs will get the light to pin their ears back and crush some fools.
      - 09/01/2017 at 10:47 AM #39069
        3
        
        FtheY
        Participant
        
        I sure hope so. I want to wreak havoc in provostan.
  - 09/01/2017 at 1:45 PM #39125
    1
    
    Puget Ute
    Participant
    
    UND beat SUU 45-23 last year.
Author

Posts

Viewing 3 reply threads

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.