Happy Holidays! And by holidays, I mean bowl season – the most wonderful tiiiiiime of the yeeeeeear!
Utah landed a spot in the Holiday Bowl this year, following a first-ever outright Pac12 South Championship. This was the finish predicted at the beginning of the year by advanced metrics: see here and here, so that’s kinda neat.
But it wouldn’t be a shakeitsugaree post without a graph of some sort, so I charted Utah’s Pac12 wins, by year, since joining the conference:
The trendline tells the story here – despite the low R-squared value (wins by year is kind of a volatile thing, especially over a small sample size), the trend is definitely positive. I like our chances to repeat in the South next year!!
So, on to the final game of the year – what does S&P+ have to say about the Utah vs. Northwestern matchup?
S&P+ ranks Utah 17, Northwestern 80; this system predicts a Utah victory by a margin of 15.5 points. So, we win pretty handily, says Bill Connelly.
I wanted to dive a little deeper into this matchup and try to predict where things might go wrong for Utah and right for Northwestern, so here are a few places where Northwestern excels:
Northwestern Overall Defense S&P+ 32
Northwestern Rushing Defense S&P+ 19
Northwestern’s defense is not to be taken lightly (Utah’s Overall Defense S&P+ ranks 22), and they defend the run well. Northwestern’s offense is another story:
Northwestern Overall Offense S&P+ 103
Northwestern Rushing Offense S&P+ 112
Northwestern Passing Offense S&P+ 85
So the defenses are probably going to dominate this game, with Utah‘s offense having a bit of an advantage, according to the numbers:
Utah Overall Offense S&P+ 43
Utah Rushing Offense S&P+ 27
Utah Passing Offense S&P+ 49
I like the ‘strength on strength’ matchup of Utah’s rushing attack vs. Northwestern’s rushing defense – it will be fun to see who wins that battle – but it looks like to me that Utah might win this game through the air (as I am typing that, I am chuckling a little bit): Northwestern Passing Defense S&P+ 75. If Shelley and the wide receiver corp can get something going through the air, I like that 15 point margin.
What do all of you think? Do these numbers make sense to you? Any score predictions?
Cheers, everyone!
*Edited to include Northwestern Passing Defense S&P+
This is a good point, Tony – it’s my understanding that the S&P+ rankings are fluid – meaning, they are calculated on a game by game basis. So you are correct that today’s rankings are impacted by previous games where we were at ‘full’ strength. However, there have been four games without Huntley & Moss and the offense did just fine:
So, the 40+ point games impact the ranking, but so do the 30 point games when we weren’t at full strength.
As an aside, S&P+ says we definitely should have lost the CCG, but not only because of poor offensive play – most likely forced by an elite defense – but it also assigns about 8 of Washington’s points to ‘turnover luck‘
But I digress …
So, what would the offense look like without Huntley and Moss? Serviceable. What will the offense look like without Huntley, Moss and Covey? I agree – there are no data for that scenario. What will the defense look like without Hansen? Again, it’s unclear. However – part of the S&P+ system is to account for depth; it’s part of the reason that teams like Alabama and Michigan are always in the top rankings. So, there is some contingency for personnel loss due to injury ‘baked into’ the S&P+ formula. That being said, we are a better team in almost every metric, offense and defense. Even with the losses of our key contributors, it seems very likely Utah gets the W here.
Like I said in my original post, if Shelley and Co. can find any traction at all in the passing game, I like Utah by 15. Will they? That’s a different question. Bovada has the line at Utah -7; if I weren’t a starving grad student, I’d probably give those points.
Cheers
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
.Rate your excitement level for Utah Men's Basketball playing in the NIT
Total Voters: 124
Loading ...
