Larry Scott on targeting

Welcome to Ute Hub Forums Utah Utes Sports Football Larry Scott on targeting

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #69323
      KiYi-Ute
      Participant

      Larry Scott says that the Pac12 didn’t miss the targeting call against Porter Gustin in last week’s U$C/WSU game:

      https://twitter.com/austincmarshall/status/1044794475782987776

      The level of incompetence is staggering. Are they afraid of liability if they come out and say that they missed this call? It sure seems like either:

      A) Pac-12 officials don’t know what they’re doing.

      B) Targeting is being used to skew games in the favor of one team or another, or to protect “top-tier” Pac12 programs.

      Or C) All of the above.

      For those who missed the no-call in question: https://twitter.com/CFBgifer/status/1043379973753581568

    • #69325
      Chidojuan
      Participant

      The correct answer is C, but there is a caveat. The league is also trying to protect itself from liability. Football doesn’t seem to be as much of a sacred cow on the West Coast, so they’re trying to cover their butts and not get lumped in with the CTE lawsuits.

    • #69326
      ironman1315
      Participant

      Translation: I am an idiot and my refs are idiots and we have no idea just WTF we are doing.

    • #69328
      Wilson’s Mustache
      Participant

      Either Larry Scott doesn’t watch football or the PAC-12 has a different defintion of targeting than the rest of us.

    • #69330
      Stone
      Participant

      The issue is consistency. The Pac12 officiating appears to have no consistent standard. If the two Utah targeting calls in the UW game are targeting, then Gustin was absolutely targeting. If the Utah calls were reversed or Scott said that they were the wrong calls, then I might be fine with Gustin’s no-call. 

    • #69332
      6
      EagleMountainUte
      Participant

      I said Fire Larry Scott a few months ago and all I got was thumbs down. 

      Nothing to see here guys just Larry Scott doubling down on being a dumbass. Scott could take over for Sarah Huckabee-Sanders if he wanted to. 

      • #69334
        2
        Chidojuan
        Participant

        Who would thumbs down you for calling for Scott’s job? Pac-12 network is a joke, a really bad joke, and that was all on him if I’m not mistaken. Also, he didn’t go to bat for USC during the sanctions, they had to bend over and take it up the tailpipe, while all of the other big schools continue to get a slap on the wrist for similar or worse violations. I know he became commissioner that year, but he should have stepped up for them. U of Pay happened under his tenure. The perception of the conference has been trending steadily downward. He’s worse that Roger Goodell. I don’t see why more AD’s are not calling for his head. Anyone think the SEC would tolerate this? The only good thing he did was expand the conference to include Utah and Colorado. He’s bad and should feel bad.

        • #69335
          EagleMountainUte
          Participant

          He did put a stop to this though a few years back:

        • #69341
          Chidojuan
          Participant

          I’m fine with the thumbs down, but can anyone make a case for why Scott should stay? Anyone? Bueller?

          • #69344
            UteThunder
            Participant

            If I may steal a page from the playbook of the Taylor/Whit defenders . . .

            “Who ya gonna replace him with?”

            This has proven to be an ironclad defense against those who want someone fired. /sarcasm

             

            **Note: I don’t want Whittingham fired, but I get so tired of the people who defend him using this question as their argument against people who do think he should go.

            • #69349
              Chidojuan
              Participant

              Great question. I’ve actually tried to stay out of that debate regarding Whittingham, it’s still too early in the season for me. The person I would want is a former football coach with a successful background in business administration/marketing. Does such a person exist? I don’t know.

              • #69355
                UteThunder
                Participant

                Thumbs up for at least throwing out some criteria of who you would want and admitting that might not be an option.

            • #69373
              chinngiskhaan
              Participant

              Commissioner Dr. Hill has a nice ring to it.

      • #69340
        Itacoatiara22
        Participant

        In fairness, your posts recently have been pretty easy to thumbs down.

        • #69350
          EagleMountainUte
          Participant

          In fairness I consistently post on a board that is supposed to be about expressing opinions on Utah football. All I got for you is Boylen’s greatest moment: “Nice of you to show up..”

          • #69359
            Itacoatiara22
            Participant

            Lol.  I didn’t say there was anything wrong with your posts…just that they were easy to thumbs down.  You are building that reputation on the board.  I see your name and my first thought is, “Wonder what complaints or fire Whit comments he has this time?”

    • #69333
      EagleMountainUte
      Participant

      I think what he failed to mention is the command center back in San Fran has Direct so they can’t watch the game. They tried casting it to a TV but the feed kept resetting. 

    • #69336
      UtMtBiker
      Participant

      How the F**k is the Fotu tageting call correct and this was not a targeting or a roughing (driving the QB to the ground and landing on him).  This thing is out of control.  

    • #69352
      SteelUte
      Participant

      I was watching that game and about crapped my pants when they didn’t throw Gustin out for targeting.  It is getting harder to be a fan of the game when you don’t know the rules- I can’t imagine being a player and not knowing what you can or can’t do.

       

    • #69414
      Itacoatiara22
      Participant

      Thumbs up for you, sir.

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.