247 sports news I just saw.

This topic has 11 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 6 months ago by noneyadb.

Viewing 3 reply threads

Author

Posts
- 12/17/2017 at 6:15 PM #51584
  
  EagleMountainUte
  Participant
  
  Kind of surprised that Oregon was still considered number one.
  
  https://247sports.com/college/washington/Article/Brandon-Kaho-gives-Washington-Huskies-the-top-recruiting-class-in-Pac-12-112376476/Amp
- 12/17/2017 at 7:01 PM #51589
  21
  
  Utah
  Participant
  
  Huh. Makes you wish Kyle could have won the PAC-12 one of the three times he was one win away…
  
  That sucks. I get losing kids to USC and Alabama. But Washington? That sucks. They are no better than we are.
  - 12/17/2017 at 7:14 PM #51593
    2
    
    Sweetness
    Participant
    
    ??? I think we will always lose more than we win when it comes to recruiting against UW, so long as their program is not a mess. There’s a reason they’ve consistently had top 20-15 recruiting classes the last 7-8 years. Seattle is an amazing city and UW is a great school. No shame in losing this battle. We were never in it with Kaho.
    - 12/17/2017 at 7:45 PM #51597
      21
      
      UteFanatic
      Participant
      
      In addition, Peterson is one of the best coaches in the country.
  - 12/17/2017 at 9:16 PM #51605
    1
    
    noneyadb
    Participant
    
    When has Whitt been one win away from winning PAC 12?
    - 12/17/2017 at 9:26 PM #51606
      5
      
      Tony (admin)
      Keymaster
      
      He must mean the pac-12 south.
  - 12/18/2017 at 8:26 AM #51616
    2
    
    EagleMountainUte
    Participant
    
    I am not going to have this discussion with you again. The obvious answer is a lot of reasons.
- 12/17/2017 at 10:33 PM #51608
  1
  
  Utahute72
  Participant
  
  The problem with those rankings is they depend on the number you sign, as well as the quality of the recruits, measured in star rankings. So since we are signing a smaller class (because of returning missionaries) we generally won’t challenge for those higher numbers. The average star rating usually puts us somewhere in the middle of the pack (or PAC, if you will).
- 12/17/2017 at 10:38 PM #51609
  
  Utahute72
  Participant
  
  For example we are currently ranked 80th, with a numerical rating of 131.21, but with an average rating per recruit of 86.23. BYU is 68th, with a numerical rating of 147.92, but a per recruit rating of 81.96.
  - 12/18/2017 at 9:33 AM #51621
    1
    
    noneyadb
    Participant
    
    With who Utah is still in consideration for and positions needed, fully expect that average per recruit to drop.
    - 12/18/2017 at 6:03 PM #51646
      1
      
      Utahute72
      Participant
      
      Why would you expect that? I think we’ll see some positive movement in the coming days.
      - 12/18/2017 at 10:26 PM #51674
        
        noneyadb
        Participant
        
        Their top targets that signed elsewhere. Maybe they pick up a LB’r from USC, but considering who they are getting committs from that were previously unheard of leads me to believe that they have missed out on a few kids. Plus the targets that are considering Utah have a ranking below that 86 average. Unless they somehow sign Sewell, Irvins, Hufunga, Olave, Enis, and Williams…
Author

Posts

Viewing 3 reply threads

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.